![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Ensemble Kalman Filter is one of the most sophisticated tools available for data assimilation. Generically, a Kalman filter is a recursive algorithm that estimates the state of a dynamic system from a series of incomplete and noisy measurements. Kalman filters are used in a wide range of engineering applications, from radar to computer vision to aircraft and spacecraft navigation. Perhaps the most commonly used type of Kalman filter is the phase-locked loop, which enables radios, video equipment, and other communications devices to recover a signal from a noisy communication channel. Kalman filtering has only recently been applied to weather and climate applications, but the initial results have been so good that the Meteorological Service of Canada has incorporated it into their forecasting code. The 20th Century Reanalysis Project uses the Ensemble Kalman Filter to remove errors in the observations and to fill in the blanks where information is missing, creating a complete weather map of the troposphere. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rather than making a single estimate of atmospheric conditions at each time step, the Ensemble Kalman Filter reduces the uncertainty by covering a wide range. It produces 56 estimated weather maps—the ensemble—each slightly different from the others. The mean of the ensemble is the best estimate, and the variance within the ensemble indicates the degree of uncertainty, with less variance indicating higher certainty. The filter blends the forecasts with the observations, giving more weight to the observations when they are high-quality, or to the forecasts when the observations are noisy. The NCEP forecasting system then takes the blended 56 weather maps and runs them forward six hours to produce the next forecast. Processing one month of global weather data takes about a day of computing, with each map running on its own processor. The Kalman filter is flexible enough to change continuously, adapting to the location and number of observations as well as meteorological conditions, thus enabling the model to correct itself in each analysis cycle. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| "What we have shown is that the map for the entire troposphere is very good, even though we have only used the surface pressure observations," said Dr. Compo. He estimates that the error for the 3D weather maps will be comparable to the error of modern two- to three-day weather forecasts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Four-Dimensional Reanalysis Using Only Surface Pressure Data Over the past several years, Dr. Compo, Dr. Whitaker, and Dr. Sardeshmukh have developed a unique capability to produce high-quality six-hourly reanalyses for the troposphere from surface pressure observations alone using a data assimilation system based on the Ensemble Kalman Filter. Before the 20th Century Reanalysis Project began, they conducted a series of pilot reanalyses to establish the feasibility of producing a reanalysis dataset from the 1890s—before observational data for the upper atmosphere were available—to the present. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In one study, they chose three data assimilation systems to make their assessment. One system was a three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR) scheme very similar to that used for the NCEP-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reanalysis, which allowed them to test a system that had been extensively used and studied. This system was modified for surface pressure only and was referred to as CDAS-SFC in the study. The second system was the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnsFilt), representing the potential for advanced data assimilation systems to improve upon older 3DVAR systems. As a baseline measure, they used a third system—a climatologically based statistical interpolation scheme (EnsClim) with no dynamical model to advance information to the next analysis time step. This baseline enabled them to quantify the importance of propagating information with a dynamical model. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The researchers used modern data but reduced the observational network to resemble historical networks from four representative five-year periods, centered on 1895, 1905, 1915, and 1935. A representative example of a 500 hPa air pressure geopotential (that is, gravity-adjusted) height analysis using the simulated 1895 network at 0000 UTC (coordinated universal time) 20 December 2001 is shown in figure 3 (p53). Analyses produced with the three data assimilation systems using only 308 surface pressure observations were compared with the full NCEP-NCAR reanalysis, which used all available observations at all levels (more than 150,000). In this example, the EnsClim analysis depicts many of the large-scale barotropic features associated with this time, including a substantial block over the North Atlantic and deep troughs over Europe and the North Pacific, but misses the smaller synoptic-scale features. In contrast, the CDAS-SFC analysis has many small-scale features, but they are positioned incorrectly, resulting in an error comparable to that of the EnsClim. The Ensemble Filter was able to represent not only the large-scale features, but also many of the synoptic-scale features, and had an overall smaller error for this case and throughout the month tested. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| To demonstrate the influence of a single surface pressure observation on the resulting analysis in the Ensemble Filter and CDAS-SFC systems, the researchers conducted four single-observation assimilation experiments. Two "observations" were assimilated separately by both systems. Each observation was prescribed to have a value 1 hPa larger than the surface pressure forecast for 0600 UTC 25 December 2001 from the previous assimilation using a 1905 network. The results of the separate experiments are plotted together in figure 4 to make a summary of the results. The filled contours show the first-guess geopotential height field at 1,000 (bottom) and 300 hPa (top) from the CDAS-SFC (left) and Ensemble Filter (right). The line contours show the analysis increment, the difference between the analysis after assimilating the indicated observation and the first-guess field. | The Ensemble Filter was able to represent not only the large-scale features, but also many of the synoptic-scale features, and had an overall smaller error for this case and throughout the month tested. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the CDAS-SFC system, the analysis increments for the two experiments are identical—each is centered on the observation location, is largest at the surface, and decreases with the height. In contrast, the right panels illustrate the ability of the Ensemble Filter to create spatially inhomogeneous background error covariances that change with the flow and observational density. The analysis increments produced by the two observations are quite different, reflecting the larger expected uncertainty in the observation-poor central Pacific and smaller uncertainty in the observation-rich continental North America. The larger uncertainty becomes a larger analysis increment. The uncertainty in the first guess, the background-error covariance, over the mid-Pacific translates an observation 1 hPa above the background into a general weakening of the nearby trough at 1,000 hPa directly to the east of the observation, and even more weakening of the upper-level trough at 300 hPa to the Southeast of the observation. In this case, a single surface pressure observation produces an analysis increment that is tilted with height and has maximum amplitude in the upper troposphere. The Ensemble Filter also changes the sign of the increment to the Northwest of the observation. Even over the interior continent, the effect of the single observation, though smaller, still has maximum amplitude in the upper troposphere and is tilted with height. This example illustrates how the Ensemble Kalman Filter can reconstruct three-dimensional conditions from two-dimensional data. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Figure 5 (p55) illustrates the degree to which the principal mid-tropospheric features for an extreme event, the famous post-Christmas snowstorm of December 1947, are present in a reanalysis map using only surface pressure observations and the Ensemble Kalman Filter (left panel). The reanalysis features are compared with those seen in maps which used all available surface, radiosonde, and other upper-tropospheric observations: a hand-drawn real-time map from the Air Weather Service (middle panel) and a map from a reanalysis using the full NCEP assimilation system (right panel). It is remarkable that the Ensemble Filter reanalysis, using only the surface pressure observations and a lower-resolution model, is able to replicate many of the features seen in the hand-drawn mid-tropospheric analysis produced at the time, arguably better than the higher-resolution NCEP system. Most likely, this advantage arises from the Kalman gain, which adjusts for both the meteorological conditions and the observational network. The NCEP system used in the right-hand panel does not have this flexibility and could probably be improved by altering the system to account for the sparse observations. | The new 3D atmospheric dataset will provide missing information about the conditions in which early-century extreme climate events occurred, such as the Dust Bowl of the 1930s and the arctic warming of the 1920s to 1940s.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Figure 6 provides additional evidence that the Ensemble Kalman Filter-produced upper-level tropospheric circulation fields will reflect the actual atmospheric variations. Shown in the black dots are newly digitized daily-averaged radiosonde observations of 500 hPa (approximately 5,500 meter altitude) temperature at Ilmala, Finland (62.2°N, 24.92°E) for the period November 1943-October 1944. The variability produced by the reanalysis (red stars) at this high-latitude location appears to be consistent with the direct measurements even on a case-by-case basis, suggesting that the Ensemble Kalman Filter will be able to reconstruct upper-air variability of both weather and climate variations throughout the 20th century. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall, the feasibility studies of Dr. Compo and his collaborators suggest that the extratropical, upper-tropospheric Northern Hemispheric height errors obtained from Ensemble Kalman Filter-based analyses will be comparable to current two- to three-day weather prediction forecast errors. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Filling In and Correcting the Historical Record With the 2007 INCITE allocation run on NERSC's Bassi and Jacquard systems, the researchers reconstructed weather maps for the years 1918 to 1949. In 2008, they plan to extend the dataset back to 1892 and forward to 2007, spanning the 20th century. In the future, they hope to run the model at higher resolution on more powerful computers, and perhaps extend the global dataset back to 1850. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| One of the first results of the INCITE award is that more historical data are being made available to the international research community. This project will provide climate modelers with surface pressure observations never before released from Australia, Canada, Croatia, the United States, Hong Kong, Italy, Spain, and 11 West African nations. When the researchers see gaps in the data, they contact the country's weather service for more information, and the prospect of contributing to a global database has motivated some countries to increase the quality and quantity of their observational data. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The team also aims to reduce inconsistencies in the atmospheric climate record, which stem from differences in how and where atmospheric conditions are observed. Until the 1940s, for example, weather and climate observations were mainly taken from the Earth's surface. Later, weather balloons were added. Since the 1970s, extensive satellite observations have become the norm. Discrepancies in data resulting from these different observing platforms have caused otherwise similar climate datasets to perform poorly in determining the variability of storm tracks or of tropical and Antarctic climate trends. In some cases, flawed datasets have produced spurious long-term trends. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The new 3D atmospheric dataset will provide missing information about the conditions in which early-century extreme climate events occurred, such as the Dust Bowl of the 1930s (figure 7) and the arctic warming of the 1920s to 1940s. It will also help to explain climate variations that may have misinformed early-century policy decisions, such as the prolonged wet period in central North America that led to overestimates of expected future precipitation and over-allocation of water resources in the Colorado River basin. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| But the most important use of weather data from the past will be the validation of climate model simulations and projections into the future. "This dataset will provide an important validation check on the climate models being used to make 21st century climate projections in the recently released Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)," Dr. Compo said. "Our dataset will also help improve the climate models that will contribute to the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report." | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contributor: Dr. Gil Compo, CIRES and the University of Colorado-Boulder; Dr. Jeff Whitaker, NOAA Earth System Research Lab; Dr. Prashant Sardeshmukh, CIRES and the University of Colorado-Boulder | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Further Reading
G. P. Compo, J. S. Whitaker, and P. D. Sardeshmukh. 2006. Feasibility of a 100-year reanalysis using only surface pressure data. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 87 (2): 175-190. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Published by IOP Publishing in association with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, for the US Department of Energy. Copyright © 2008 by IOP. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||