| THE TERASCALE SUPERNOVA INITIATIVE |
| Modeling the first instants of a STAR'S DEATH |
| BY ROBERT IRION |
| Scientists funded by the SciDAC Terascale Supernova Initiative (TSI) project are modeling the
violent physics of exploding stars. Their work has revealed instability in the shock wave blasts,
imparting rotation to the new-born neutron stars in their cores.
|
 |
|
Fig. 1. A bright flare of light (lower left) in the outskirts of galaxy NGC 4526, spotted by
telescopes in 1994, marked the death of a giant star.
|
|
| When the biggest stars in the universe have consumed
all of their fuel, they don't die quietly.
Instead, they explode as supernovae with energy
blasts of more than 1053 ergs. These detonations
briefly outshine entire galaxies of hundreds of
billions of stars (an example being the 1994
supernova shown in figure 1). In our own Milky
Way galaxy, astronomers have witnessed several
supernovae over the centuries as brilliant "guest
stars" that then faded just as mysteriously as they
had appeared.
|
|
But supernovae are more than just spectacular
light shows. They seed space with oxygen, silicon,
calcium, iron, and heavier elements - the
ingredients of our planet and ourselves. Indeed,
astrophysicists believe that many of the atoms
in our bodies were propelled into space by
nearby supernovae before our solar system
formed, about 4.6 billion years ago. So in a way,
supernovae represent our most direct connection
to the cosmos.
|
|
They also produce some of the most exotic
physics that nature has to offer. They make neutron
stars and black holes, as well as torrents of
elusive particles called neutrinos. Their temperatures
and densities rise far beyond the kind of
conditions physicists will ever be able to create
on Earth. For all of these reasons, the effort to
understand supernovae is a central quest in
astrophysics today.
|
|
It is not yet clear exactly what processes make
stars explode. Today, nearly four dozen scientists
at nine different institutions are tackling
this problem with funding from SciDAC in a
project called the Terascale Supernova Initiative
(TSI). The multidisciplinary team of astrophysicists,
nuclear physicists, applied mathematicians,
and computer scientists has already
developed some of the most sophisticated supercomputer
simulations of the first moments of
the death of the largest stars, and has unveiled
some surprising phenomena deep within the
dying stars (see figure 2).
|
|
|
Fig. 2. A 3D visualization reveals lopsided blast waves of gas in the
moments after a supernova explodes.
|
The physics of core collapse
The TSI team, led by astrophysicist Dr Anthony
Mezzacappa of Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(ORNL), is exploring what happens when the
core of a large star - i.e. a star at least eight times
as massive as our Sun - runs out of the elements
it needs to create energy. The pressures inside
these massive stars are intense enough to spark
thermonuclear fusion of atomic nuclei beyond
hydrogen, the fuel of ordinary stars. Helium, carbon,
oxygen, sulfur, and silicon all fuse and
release energy in an accelerating sequence of
combustion. This sequence builds onion-like
shells of these elements. The heavier elements
occupy shells closer to the star's hot center,
because it takes progressively higher temperatures
to ignite fusion as the atomic nuclei grow
more massive.
|
|
Fig. 3. Simulations explore the physics of turbulent shock waves deep within supernovae.
Fig. 4. Neutrinos streak outward from a collapsed core.
|
|
This chain of nuclear fusion releases energy
only until iron nuclei form. Thus, fusion stops
with iron. As the iron core grows from the
fusion of lighter elements in the star into iron,
the pressure due to the electrons in the core
(which is the dominant source of pressure) can
no longer counteract the inward gravitational
force of the core. The core implodes, in an event
called "core collapse." This ultimately leads to a
stellar explosion (see simulation in figure 3) and
the synthesis of heavy elements - the hallmarks
of a core-collapse supernova. The core collapse
also produces neutrinos (at the rate of 1057 per
second) as shown in the simulation in figure 4
and discussed later.
|
|
Within a fraction of a second, this collapse
squeezes the inner part of the star's core into a
volume just tens of kilometers wide that resists
further crushing. The inner core rebounds like a
piston, creating a shock wave that rifles back into
the still-collapsing outer core. If the shock kept
going, it would blow the star apart and spawn the
supernova blast. But in all realistic computer
models of this process, the shock wave stalls deep
inside the star. This is the essence of the core-collapse
challenge: what physical processes drive the
shock wave violently enough to eject a star's
worth of matter into space?
|
|
TSI researchers are formulating new ways to
examine critical events in the supernova core
within the first second after the core bounces.
The suite of physics that is required to model
these events accurately is so diverse that this challenge
may be considered a "renaissance problem"
in modern physics.
|
|
Nature operates in cycles. On Earth, relentless
cycles of water, carbon, and minerals shape
our dynamic planet. And in space, our solar
system and galaxy are part of a cycle of stellar
birth and death - a rhythm in which
supernovae play a crucial part.
|
 |
|
Fig. 5.Cassiopeia A, one of the closest supernova remnants to Earth, exploded into view about
340 years ago. Jets of energy expelled iron, oxygen, and other heavy elements into space.
|
|
|
Stars arise at the centers of cool clouds of
gas and dust that take tens of millions of years
to contract and heat under gravity. Stellar
nurseries create a whole range of objects, from
dwarfs to giant stars. Astronomers have
determined that most stars are similar in size
to our Sun, which is an average star. These
stars fuse hydrogen into helium during stable
lifetimes lasting billions of years.
|
|
When hydrogen runs out, stars like these
often burn helium for a short time and
become expanded red giants. Some of the
outer gas escapes, condensing into dust
grains that drift into nebulae for new
generations of stars. Usually, a white dwarf,
packing a Sun's worth of mass into an Earthsized
ball of carbon, is left behind at the core.
This dense cinder generally cools off over
billions of years until it fades from view.
The outcome is different for those rare stars
that are at least 8-10 times as massive as our
Sun. When the centers of these stars collapse
at the end of the nuclear burning phase, the
added densities accelerate the actions of the
"weak" interaction, resulting in numerous
electron captures that produce neutrinos (see
sidebar "The importance of particles that barely
exist," p33) that transport energy and "lepton
number" from the core. They leave behind an
ultracompact sphere, largely of neutrons, about
10 km across.
|
|
The implosion that creates a neutron star or
black hole unleashes a shock wave that
propels the rest of the star into space. One or
two "core-collapse" supernovae flare in our
Milky Way galaxy each century (see figure 5).
But in the entire cosmos, a star explodes
roughly once every second. This has
transformed the universe from a bland fog of
hydrogen and helium into the rich mixture of
heavier elements we see around us today.
|
|
Astrophysicists estimate that the hot-burning
cores of massive stars and their deaths in
core-collapse supernovae produce most of the
cosmic supply of elements with atomic
masses between oxygen and iron. Corecollapse
supernovae fling these elements into
space. And nucleosynthesis in the exploding
supernova is believed to create half of the
cosmic abundance of elements heavier than
iron. Like dust in the wind, these "metals"
scatter into space. The debris sets the stage
for new stars and solar systems with higher
proportions of aluminum, phosphorus,
calcium, copper, lead, uranium, and so on.
This is the stuff of warm rocky planets and,
ultimately, life.
|
|
Supernovae also power cycles of energy
within a galaxy. The intense shocks produced
by the cosmic blasts expand for eons, churning
a galaxy's gas and dust. Indeed, the
cumulative shocks of many supernovae can
eject matter beyond a galaxy's gravitational
grasp. In this way, cosmic blasts from
supernovae continue to sculpt the universe and
the ingredients of its deepest reaches of space.
|
|
|
For example, the dynamics of a collapsing star
depend critically on all three fundamental forces
of nature: gravity, electroweak, and the strong
nuclear forces. Gravity around the compact core
is so strong that general relativity is crucial to
determining the outcome. The core's density
pushes the limits of scientific understanding of
the strong nuclear force and the physical states
that matter assumes. Magnetic fields in a charged,
rapidly rotating medium are difficult to understand
and to simulate computationally.
|
|
Most critically, the dense object at the heart of
the collapse, the new-born "proto-neutron star,"
is so hot that it radiates huge numbers of neutrinos.
The supernova emits more than 1053 ergs
of energy in about 10 s - more energy than the
rest of the stars in the observable universe combined.
|
Astrophysicists know why massive stars
explode when they run out of nuclear fuel, but
they do not yet understand how the explosions
happen. The sudden collapse of a star's core
sparks events that push physics far beyond its
well-known regimes. With no way to test those
extremes in labs on Earth, researchers rely on
innovative algorithms that run on
supercomputers at very high speeds.
The TSI project uses a layered approach to
study the complex ingredients of a supernova
recipe:
- Magnetohydrodynamics. The behavior of
fluids in strong magnetic fields is described by
magnetohydrodynamics. This is usually applied
to stellar research.
- Multi-scale physics. Detailed calculations
must span more than five orders of magnitude
in scale, from the smallest turbulent eddies to
the shock wave blasting outward.
- Einsteinian gravity. Ultrastrong
gravitational fields make it essential to use full
general relativity.
- Super-nuclear densities. The equation of
state describing matter in the newly imploded
core - the "proto-neutron star" - requires a
deeper grasp of the strong nuclear force inside
atomic nuclei.
- Microscopic neutrino-nuclear
interactions and macroscopic radiation
transport. A colossal flux of 1057 neutrinos
erupts from the core in all directions and at
different energies, but details of their impact
on the star's infalling matter remains unclear.
This latter challenge is a key frontier for TSI.
A solution requires a full description of each
neutrino's 3D position and 3D momentum,
which is obtained by solving the Boltzman
kinetic equations (see figure 7). The
computer code must solve this labyrinthine
six-dimensional set of algebraic equations
(with time as the seventh dimension) to
reveal how neutrinos affect the crush of
matter cascading inward.
Mathematicians and computer scientists have
devised two methods for making this problem
tractable. First, "custom preconditioners" applied
to the algebraic equations lead to much faster
solutions. Second, the solvers run on a massively
parallel architecture of thousands of processors.
Even so, a typical TSI simulation can require up
to 100,000 processor hours to capture a mere
0.03 s of physics at the supernova's core.
|
 |
 |
|
Fig. 6. The schematic diagram is indicative of the infalling stellar mass towards the core (M) and
its rebound from the tightly packed core (overturn at the gain radius), giving rise to the shock
wave. The macroscopic hydrodynamics is influenced by the microscopic neutrino producing
reactions in the core and the neutrino absorbing ones from the escaping neutrino flux. The
protoneutron star at the core is also shown. Fig. 7. Boltzman kinetic equations.
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 8. TSI researchers devised ways to transmit and store terabytes of data among multiple national sites.
|
|
Nearly all of that energy flows out as neutrinos
(see figure 4). The explosion relies crucially
on how these escaping neutrinos interact with
matter rushing inward from the rest of the star.
These interactions are dictated by the weak force.
|
|
Using new methods, TSI scientists are characterizing
neutrino transport and neutrino interactions
and grasping how this radiation affects
hydrodynamical flows in the collapsing star.
One promising line of research involves neutrino
oscillations: a phenomenon in which neutrinos
of different "flavors" can transform into
one another. Theoretical work by physicist Dr
George Fuller of the University of California, San
Diego, and his colleagues suggests that this mixing
occurs over a broad range of energies for
both neutrinos and their antimatter counterparts,
antineutrinos. Even though the mass differences
between neutrino flavors are very small,
these rapid-fire transformations could affect the
dynamics of the supernova shock wave and the
creation of new heavy elements in nucleosynthesis.
Dr Fuller's group is now investigating
whether this "Background Dominant Solution"
for neutrino mixing plays a major role in real
supernovae.
|
New analysis tools
To achieve its scientific result, the TSI team has
pushed the boundaries of its field in two distinct
ways. First, new computer algorithms have
greatly increased the speed and fidelity of analysis
in both 2D and 3D simulations of the shock
wave and its environment. Second, the team has
overcome steep challenges in handling and managing
vast quantities of data across networks that
span the continent.
|
|
To understand neutrino transport at the core
of a supernova, the scientists must solve systems
of linear algebraic equations underpinning the
solution of the neutrino transport equations
known as Boltzman kinetic equations (see figure
7). The linear equations themselves are
straightforward, but their scale is daunting,
involving solution vectors that are terabytes
(1012 bytes) to petabytes (1015 bytes) in size. To
cope with the vast number of calculations, TSI
researchers have developed "custom preconditioners"
to redefine their linear systems so as to
facilitate their solution.
|
|
These techniques are used in the context of
Newton-Krylov methods for actually solving the
systems of equations. Implementations of these
preconditioning and solution algorithms for
parallel computers were developed through collaborations
between TSI scientists at the State
University of New York at Stony Brook (SUNY
SB) and ORNL with applied mathematicians at
the University of Tennessee at Knoxville (UTK)
and Santa Clara University in California. These
allowed the TSI team to divide the calculations
among many thousands of identical computer processors.
In this "massively parallel" computing
architecture, the neutrino transport equations
finally become tractable.
|
|
|
Fig. 9. A community Linux cluster houses data from simulations in the TSI, providing interactive access for team
members at different sites. Software divides the supernova data into slabs for faster transport and visualization.
|
|
The preconditioners became an enabling technology
for Dr Douglas Swesty and Dr Eric Myra
of SUNY SB, who say they were able to carry out
the most physically detailed 2D core-collapse
supernova simulations to date using them. Earlier
simulations used a gray approximation,
which assumes a shape of the energy distribution
spectrum for neutrinos. In contrast, the
Swesty and Myra simulations compute the
energy spectra of the neutrinos, which change
with time and with position as the supernova
evolves. That's far more realistic, but it exacts a
high penalty in computational cost. For this
reason, explains Dr Swesty, the computing
resources provided through SciDAC are essential
to solving the problem.
|
|
Other TSI scientists initially found that the
terabyte-sized data streams from powerful
supercomputers - including IBM's Seaborg
processors at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
in California (NERSC) and the Cray X1E at
ORNL - were difficult to handle and transfer
between workstations. For example, physicist Dr
John Blondin at North Carolina State University
(NCSU) in Raleigh was unable to transfer the
results of his 3D simulations over the Internet or
view them on his workstations.
|
|
To tackle this challenge of data management,
the TSI team worked with computer scientists at
the Logistical Computing and Internetworking
Laboratory, UTK, and used their Logistical Runtime
System to move data on parallel streams,
across multiple Internet paths (see figure 8). This
tactic increased data-transfer rates by 10-20
times. Moreover, data are now stored on a community
Linux cluster at NCSU (see figure 9),
which yields interactive access to all team members.
The team also worked with Networking
researchers at ORNL to move data from the
ORNL Cray X1E to NCSU, using the Bearer Channel
Control Protocol.
|
|
Indeed, the project's challenges have arisen in
part from the enormity of the data sets, says
Dr Blondin. Pervasive parallelization is the key
to solving these challenges. From start to finish,
the entire process is divided into multiple components:
running the computer codes, writing
data onto disks, sending data across networks,
and visualizing the results.
|
|
Neutrinos are full of surprises. They come in
three "flavors" - electron neutrinos, muon
neutrinos, and tau neutrinos - with different
tiny masses, although scientists still don't know
what those masses are. Physicists have
confirmed that neutrinos are flavor shifters:
they can oscillate from one flavor to another as
they move at close to the speed of light. A lone
neutrino, dashing through space, could
penetrate a light-year of solid lead without
noticing other particles. In the parlance of
physics, a neutrino's interaction cross-section
is vanishingly small. Yet the billion-degree core
of a supernova produces so many neutrinos
from such a compressed volume - 1057 of
them - that they "blow" against the star's
infalling matter with significant force. Nailing
down the details of how neutrinos cascade
outward and interact with matter during the
earliest stages of a core-collapse supernova is
crucial to the supernova science.
|
 |
|
Fig. 10. Super-Kamiokande, a neutrino detector in Japan, holds 50,000 tons of ultrapure water
surrounded by light tubes. Neutrinos from a nearby supernova that occurred in 1987 sparked
flashes of light in smaller water tanks.
|
|
|
The link between supernovae and neutrinos
became strikingly real on February 23, 1987,
when light from an exploded star, Supernova
1987A, in a small nearby galaxy first swept
across Earth (see sidebar "A history of violence
in the sky," p35). Although the star was
170,000 light-years away, the flux of neutrinos
on our planet was an incredible 100 billion per
square centimeter. Of this onslaught, physicists
managed to catch only 19 of the fleeting
particles when they collided with atomic nuclei
in special neutrino detectors, because neutrinos
have such low interaction cross sections.
|
|
Neutrino detectors have to be very large
because of the low interaction rates of
neutrinos (see figure 10). Scientists think they
are ready to catch a burst of the particles from
the next nearby supernova - providing a
glimpse of its innermost turbulence. Neutrinos
escape from the explosion essentially in an
instant, while the explosion itself takes many
hours to rip apart the star. Therefore, a pulse of
alien neutrinos may provide an "early warning"
for astronomers to look skyward for an
impending supernova. A computer alert
network links the neutrino detectors together
for this purpose.
|
|
During their wait, physicists are confronting
many vexing questions about neutrinos. Most
notably, how massive are they? Experiments
show that neutrinos possess a smidgen of mass,
but their exact value is unclear. Knowing that
value will prove critical to specifying the degree
to which neutrinos impact on their surroundings
at the core of a burgeoning supernova.
|
|
TSI researchers believe that oscillations
among electron, muon, and tau neutrinos may
play an important role in the physics of the
explosion. But for the time being, the team's
simulations feature mass neutrinos. Endowing
them with mass would make the computations
too complex, says Dr Mezzacappa, because
neutrino transport models are not yet reliable
even for zero mass. The models must include
full "neutrino distribution functions," which
define the energies and 3D motions of the
particles at all times. When one includes the
spatial co-ordinates within the explosion and
the dimension of time itself, solving for
neutrino transport becomes a sevendimensional
miasma.
|
|
It's a lot of fuss over a particle that's as
close to nothing as it is possible to get. But in
the end, TSI physicists believe that the
dynamics of neutrinos will solve the mystery of
why supernovae explode at all.
|
|
More than the eye can see
That last step - visualization - is vital for both
the TSI team and its audience of peers and the
public. Visual representation can be very helpful
in understanding the details of complex physical
analyses. But the outputs from supernova
simulations are so gigantic that one cannot portray
all aspects of the data at once. Instead, visualization
experts are creating ways to highlight
specific features of the turbulent flow, such as the
flux and energy of neutrinos or the entropy of gas.
|
|
Fig. 11. TSI simulations suggest that an unstable spiral shock wave, called a SASI, rotates around the core of a supernova in its first 0.03 s of being.
Fig. 12. Matter falling onto the proto-neutron star gets wound up by this intense flow pattern.
|
|
Visualization tools developed by the TSI team
have led to new and striking ways to reveal and
interpret data. For example, computer scientists
at Indiana University at Indianapolis portrayed
multiple aspects of 2D hydrodynamics simulations,
including neutrino transport, with a technique
called "Lagrangian Eulerian Advection."
|
|
The resulting images make use of streaks to show
neutrino velocities and trajectories, as well as
color maps and contours to display entropy and
neutrino optical depth. Visually comparing these
fields as the shock wave develops in the simulation
helps the researchers to verify the accuracy
of their work, and provides insights into the
processes occurring deep within the supernova.
|
|
TSI visualization staff at ORNL have worked
with collaborators at Ohio State University to
look at data on a whole new scale. Rather than
visualizing stellar cores that are tens of kilometers
across, the team has developed techniques to
visualize microphysics data of the ensemble of
atomic nuclei in the stellar core. Custom volume
rendering and commercial visualization tools are
now available at the physicists' desktop computers.
|
|
The researchers may view their data in real
time and understand the nuclear structures
obtained with new 3D codes. With insightful
applications of lighting models and perspective
views, the visualizers are opening up new worlds
of data interpretation for their colleagues.
|
|
The long-written records of astronomy through
the ages are marked by brief apparitions, often
called "guest stars." Imagine the shock of
ancient observers when the night sky,
seemingly constant in its seasonal patterns,
suddenly put forth a flare of light that lingered
for weeks before fading forever. Some
historians believe that such an event - a star
exploding in our galaxy - is depicted in the
cuneiforms of the Sumerians 10,000 years
ago - and may in fact have launched their
interest in astronomy and mathematics.
|
 |
|
Fig. 13.A blast wave from Supernova 1987A
in the Large Magellanic Cloud is overtaking
gas ejected long ago by the doomed star.
|
|
|
History's most spectacular recorded
supernova occurred in 1054 AD. Chinese
astronomers preserved an account of a new
star in the constellation Taurus, visible even in
daylight. Today, nearly a millennium later, the
site is marked by a complex expanding web of
debris called the Crab Nebula. At the nebula's
heart lies a star that flashes on and off, 30
times each second. This is a rotating neutron
star, or pulsar, that emits tight beams of
intense radiation.
|
|
The next known supernovae in the Milky Way
appeared after European scientists started to
study the sky in earnest. Danish astronomer
Tycho Brahe and German astronomer Johannes
Kepler saw and measured the events in 1572
and 1604, respectively. The hot remnants of
both explosions are obvious to telescopes and
X-ray satellites today. In retrospect, the close
timing of the supernovae was a stroke of luck.
There hasn't been another one visible in our
galaxy since.
|
|
But in 1987, skywatchers were treated to
the next-best thing: a supernova in one of the
Milky Way's companions, a dwarf galaxy
called the Large Magellanic Cloud. Neutrino
observatories picked up a burst of ghostly
particles from "Supernova 1987A," and major
telescopes continue to watch its aftermath. By
examining previous images of the galaxy,
astronomers learned that the doomed star
was a blue supergiant about 20 times as
massive as our Sun and 100,000 times
brighter. And by carefully gauging the
explosion's brightness, astronomers verified
that the star's death forged huge quantities of
heavy elements - primarily a radioactive form
of nickel, which decayed to iron and released
energy for months.
|
|
Today, the blast wave from Supernova
1987A races into space. As it does, it
overtakes gaseous material ejected by the
unstable star thousands of years ago (see
figure 13). The shocks light up this matter in a
ring, sparking new outbursts of X-rays and
visible light. The celestial fireworks are giving
astronomers a direct view of how supernovae
impact their surroundings.
|
|
The star's destruction may hasten the origins
of new stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud.
Theorists suspect that supernovae can force
clouds of gas and dust to collapse in a process
called triggered star formation. This may have
sparked our solar system's birth. Some
meteorites carry evidence that they contained
iron-60, a rare isotope that comes only from
supernovae and lasts a few million years
before decaying. This metal would have
enriched our solar system only if the explosion
happened nearby - perhaps much closer than
the nearest stars we see today.
|
|
|
TSI scientists also use interactive tools like
High-Precision Rendering developed by collaborator
Dr Kwan-Liu Ma of the University of California,
Davis. These expose the detailed physics
happening on all scales throughout the explosion,
spanning more than five orders of spatial magnitude.
In addition, Scalable Parallel Visualization
lets TSI scientists study portions of their data -
at full resolution - within the available memory
space of the workstations they are using.
|
|
TSI researchers can point to several discoveries
that visualization has helped to make. One
notable find is the Spherical Accretion Shock
Instability, or SASI. In essence, simulations suggest
that once the rebounding shock wave stalls
deep inside the collapsing star, it starts to swirl
vigorously (see figure 11). These motions may
have profound effects on the shape of the explosion
and the fate of the neutron star that the
supernova leaves behind.
|
|
Surprises inside the supernova core
Dr Blondin's team first described the SASI in
2003. According to 2D models developed as part
of TSI, the outward-moving shock wave reaches
a radius of 100-200 km before it stalls. Matter
from the collapsing star streams onto and
through this standing shock front, cascading
toward the proto-neutron star. But the shock itself
behaves like an acoustical cavity, trapping and
amplifying sound waves that cannot escape back
out past the standing wave. The simulation shows
that this process quickly becomes unstable.
Within a few hundredths of a second, the shock
wave - still stuck above the proto-neutron star
- moves violently up and down.
|
|
The SciDAC-funded Terascale Supernova
Initiative (TSI) grew out of several long-term
collaborations among physicists and
astrophysicists. Applied mathematicians and
computer scientists joined the team to tackle
different research areas. Team members share
a common philosophy of, and approach to,
researching the core-collapse supernova
problem. They agree that understanding
supernovae is a key priority among the many
challenges in astrophysics and cosmology,
because exploding stars play such an
important role in the cosmic hierarchy.
|
|
In particular, supernovae are the dominant
source of heavy elements; they give birth to
neutron stars and black holes; and they drive
the chemical evolution of the galaxy. They are
also believed to produce gravitational waves. In
one aspect of TSI, researchers predict the
waveforms that may be detected by the Laser
Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory
(LIGO) and other facilities. These predictions
may help confirm a measurement that would
be a threshold in scientific history.
|
|
TSI Principal Investigator Dr Mezzacappa
notes that a core-collapse supernova could
happen in our Milky Way galaxy at any time -
perhaps not for 10 years or 30 years, but
perhaps tomorrow. If physicists are prepared
for the event, they will obtain detailed
observations of the neutrinos and gravitational
waves from the supernova. Such
measurements will yield information from the
deepest regions of the exploding star. TSI will
provide a three-dimensional multiphysics
model of the supernova, allowing physicists to
use the event as a laboratory for nuclear and
particle physics. This knowledge about the
fundamental nuclear and particle physics is
critical, because physicists cannot create those
extremes of density and composition on Earth.
|
|
Moreover, core-collapse supernovae involve
just about everything in physics: turbulent fluid
flow and instabilities, magnetic fields and
rotation, radiation transport in the form of
neutrinos and photons, and Einsteinian gravity.
In terms of the computing requirements,
visualization requirements, and geographic
spread of the TSI team, it's a daunting problem
for the computational science infrastructure.
Similar challenges are faced by other teams
working in important areas like combustion
modeling, climate modeling, lattice quantum
chromodynamics, and fusion science.
|
|
Verification of computational results against
experiments or observations as well as basic
theory is a natural requirement of research
programs. The TSI team understands the
importance of comparing its computational
predictions with real supernovae. A supernova
in our galaxy would provide detailed data
from neutrinos, gravitational waves, and
photons across the electromagnetic spectrum.
If the TSI models reproduce those
observations across the board, that would be
compelling evidence of a valid model.
|
|
Astronomers already have dozens of
observations of more distant supernovae,
containing information on the production of
elements and structures in the flows from
small scales to large scales. "Ultimately, the
true validation is against Mother Nature.
That's the bottom line," says Dr Mezzacappa.
The team constantly tests its codes,
performs parallel simulations within TSI for
internal validation, and compares its results
with other leading groups. The researchers also
run convergence testing, where the virtual grid
gets finer and finer with each simulation. If the
outcome changes, the model hasn't yet
produced a final answer. But if the outcomes
are the same, the team has converged on a
physical solution, not just a numerical one.
|
|
In Dr Mezzacappa's view, SciDAC has
allowed physicists to address this problem in
all of its complexity for the first time. Until the
computers and funding were made available
and the teams were assembled, he says,
investigators could not have studied this
multiphysics problem in earnest.
|
|
|
The scientists knew they would need to demonstrate
that the SASI persisted in a 3D simulation.
To their surprise, the instability grew. Instead of
merely oscillating, the SASI transformed into a
spiral shape that whirled around the protoneutron
star. This instability amplified as more
material plunged inward and added angular
momentum (see figure 12 p34), like a child continually
spinning a top to make it twirl faster.
|
|
The TSI team will continue working to confirm
whether the SASI plays a role in driving the
stalled blast wave out into the star when the
remaining physics is added to the models. Moreover,
the spiraling is so pronounced that the
SASI may make the inevitable explosion lopsided.
Astronomers do observe that supernovae
are not spherical. Moreover, young neutron stars
often jet through space at speeds of hundreds of
kilometers per second. An unbalanced core during
the explosion could provide that kick.
|
|
In one important consequence, the SASI may
be the source of rotational motion of neutron
stars. Most neutron stars are born spinning
dozens of times per second - a rapid rate for an
object approximately 10 km wide. Astronomers
spot them as pulsars, which emit beams of radiation
that sweep past Earth like lighthouse beacons.
If it were confirmed that the SASI sparks
that rapid spin, it would solve a long-standing
astronomical mystery.
|
|
Research must continue. The 3D models still
lack some of the detailed physics of the 2D simulations.
The V2D code suggests that convection
driven by neutrinos - an ingredient not yet
included in 3D - is intense in the early stages of
the shock rebound. Studies of the convection at
higher resolutions than ever before show that
it pervades all scales and may even penetrate
into the proto-neutron star itself. Convection
appears to drag neutron-rich material inwards,
feeding the new neutron star in the core.
Turbulence between the proto-neutron star and
the stalled shock wave may have an effect on the SASI.
|
|
Dr Blondin suspects that the spiraling
motion will remain the dominant macrophysical
process deep inside the nascent supernova. But
the TSI physicists will have their answer to this
question only when the 3D simulations include
the full range of physics that Dr Swesty's 2D
model now features. Work to include this physics
in 3D models is under way by TSI collaborations
between NCSU, ORNL, and Florida Atlantic University
(FAU). Work to include magnetic fields in
TSI's 2D models is being undertaken by scientists
at UCSD, FAU and ORNL.
|
From gravity to the elements
TSI investigations have an impact far beyond the
community of researchers funded by SciDAC.
Several TSI scientists have forged collaborations
with physicists involved with one of the key
searches in science today: the hunt for gravitational
waves.
|
 |
|
Fig. 14. Major observatories worldwide, such as the twin 10 m Keck Telescopes atop
Mauna Kea in Hawaii, continue to study supernovae. Detailed images of many
supernovae could help test the latest simulations of how stars explode.
|
|
|
Einstein's general theory of relativity predicts
that violent events, such as exploding stars or
colliding black holes, will ripple the fabric of
space-time like rocks tossed into a pond. By the
time they reach Earth, these waves will be
extraordinarily small. Still, several gravitational
wave observatories in the US, Italy, Germany,
and Japan hope to detect the disturbances,
which subtly shift the distances between objects
in a periodic way.
|
|
The experiments rely on matching a precalculated
set of "templates," or gravitational waveforms.
The templates consist of the exact
frequencies, amplitudes, and patterns of waves
expected from many combinations of astrophysical
events. It's a data-processing challenge of the
highest order, similar to that faced by the TSI scientists
themselves. To help narrow down the
search, the group use the results of their simulations
to provide updated templates of possible
gravitational wave shapes from supernovae.
|
|
Every detail makes a difference; a lopsided supernova
would spawn a wave signature distinct
from a symmetric one, for instance.
Astronomers who observe expanding clouds
of matter from supernovae (see figure 14), such as
the well-known Crab Nebula and Cassiopeia A
remnants, also look to TSI for collaboration.
These remnants glow with hot clouds of heavy
elements. Recent studies using X-ray satellites
have shown that the explosions were far from
orderly. In Cassiopeia, for instance, clumps of iron
are far more distant from the center of the explosion
than oxygen and silicon, as though the star's
deepest material was ejected the fastest in an
inside-out blast. The results of TSI simulations of
convection and turbulence may shed some light
on these fascinating astrophysical dynamics.
|
Beyond the terascale
TSI scientists already have their eye on the next
stage in computing: the petascale era, a factor of
1000 more detailed. Computers with petascale
capabilities should be available within a few years
from now if Moore's law continues apace. Project
collaborators agree that such resources will
be the only way to run 3D simulations of supernovae
that include all essential physical
processes, from neutrinos to magnetohydrodynamics
to general relativity.
|
|
Meanwhile, TSI team members look forward
to the continued advances that multidisciplinary
research promises to bring. The project's computer
scientists, mathematicians, nuclear physicists,
and astrophysicists have learned new ways
to communicate, to manage a far-flung team and
make data compatible, and to allocate precious
time and resources. "It's been an eye-opening
experience and a tremendous challenge," says
one collaborator. "But the combined gains, both
from working together as a team and from individual
contributions, have been extremely substantial."
Enabling these new modes of doing
science at a larger scale has been one of SciDAC's
great successes.
|
|
Further reading
|
|
The SciDAC program www.osti.gov/scidac.
|
|
The TSI project www.phy.ornl.gov/tsi.
|
|
J. M. Blondin 2005 Discovering new dynamics of core-collapse
supernova shock waves J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 16 370-379.
|
|
B. Messer et al. 2005 An ADI-Like preconditioner for Boltzmann
transport SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26 810-820.
|
|
W. R. Hix et al. 2005 Consequences of nuclear electron capture
in core collapse supernovae Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 201102.
|
|